Which is better for the front axle with double ball joint spring damping struts and multi-link independent suspension?

The front axle with double ball joint spring shock-absorbing strut is a shock-absorbing strut device. So, which is better for the front axle with double ball joint spring damping struts or multi-link independent suspension?

The difference between strut type and multi-link

Generally speaking, without considering factors such as space, cost, weight, etc., a 5-link system is better. At least like black box AMD and normal box AMD. Maybe your computer is not overclocked, and there is no difference in the use of the black box. As for the double ball head. It is to dismantle the A arm into 2 connecting rods. Many. BMW's double ball joint spring shock strut front axle is the official standard name of McPherson, while Mercedes-Benz has a multi-link, which is better.

The multi-link suspension form takes up a lot of space. In view of the size limitation of the model, the engine compartment of the general medium-sized car and compact car has been occupied by various components such as the engine, and there is not much space to install the complex and large multi-link Suspension Therefore, four-wheel multi-link independent suspension will be installed on some larger C-class and D-class cars. Of course, medium-sized cars are also equipped with multi-link front suspension. For example, Shanghai Volkswagen's Passat B5. He...so in some larger C-class and D-class cars, four-wheel multi-link independent suspension will be installed. Of course, medium-sized cars are also equipped with multi-link front suspension.

Which is better for the front axle with double ball joint spring damping struts and multi-link independent suspension?

In fact, they are all the same, mainly depending on the material. One more upper swing arm for the double wishbone is not necessarily good. There are ball front version and C seat (different from the size of the C seat version). The running or racing series adopts the C-seat version, and the most direct feeling brought by the double wishbone is the good-looking body posture, especially when there is no electronic control stability intervention. The MacPherson suspension shock absorber directly acts as the upper swing arm. The structure is simple, easy to maintain, and the steering accuracy is also high. After... As for the "double ball joint", it should be said to be the "double ball joint Macpherson" suspension. Improvements were made on "MacPherson".

The key issue is the double-wishbone VS pillar. The pillar type is basically equivalent to replacing the upper fork arm of the double wishbone with a pillar. The pillar is usually served by shock absorbers. It is generally believed that the double-wishbone will be easier to use if space, weight, and cost are allowed. As for the double ball joint, of course, the strict double wishbone must be 2 A-arms, and there will be no double ball joint.